AAScratch: Difference between revisions

From Libreswan
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
== virtiofs replace 9pfs: libvirt 6.2, qemu 5.0, kernel 5.4 ==
== virtiofs replace 9pfs: libvirt 6.2, qemu 5.0, kernel 5.4 ==


* [https://libvirt.org/news.html libvirt 6.2] Did not make to Fedora 32. F33 has libvirt 6.4 may pull rpm from F33.
* [https://libvirt.org/news.html libvirt 6.2] Fedora 33? Did not make to Fedora 32. May be pull rpm from F33?
* [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694166 RH BZ tracking libvirtd merge]
* [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694166 RH BZ libvirtd merge] tracking the request
* [https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/5.0#virtio QEMU 5.0] added support for virtiofsd
* [https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/5.0#virtio QEMU 5.0] added support for virtiofsd
* [https://virtio-fs.gitlab.io virtio-fs] Made to Mainline kernel 5.4
* [https://virtio-fs.gitlab.io virtio-fs] Mainline kernel 5.4
* [https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=154446243024251&w=2 virtiofs RFC patches]
* [https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=154446243024251&w=2 virtiofs RFC patches]
   
   

Revision as of 14:04, 5 June 2020

Antony's unsorted pages I want access quickly, related to libreswan, when think I know this page exist where is it. Someone moved it renamed ..

virtiofs replace 9pfs: libvirt 6.2, qemu 5.0, kernel 5.4

KVM/QEMU + vsock to replace 9pfs

KVM support for vsock and nfs support could have a better performance than 9pfs. This work could be interesting to libreswan KVM testing. It started in 2015. Slowly picking up, as 2018 it seems AWS and firecracker is pushing it. We are almost there.

VPP + DPDK IPsec

iptable rule to drop IKEv2 message id X

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/321252/drop-a-packet-depending-on-its-options-or-type

Retrieved from "https://libreswan.org/wiki/index.php?title=AAScratch&oldid=21902"