IKEv2 Child SA: Difference between revisions

From Libreswan
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Renaming IKEv2 States STATE_PARENT_I1 -> IKE_V2_I1 STATE_PARENT_I2 -> IKE_V2_I2 STATE_PARENT_I3 -> IKE_V2_I3 STATE_PARENT_R1 -> IKE_V2_R1 STATE_PARENT_R2 -> IKE_V2_R2 New...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Renaming IKEv2 States
Renaming IKEv2 States


<pre>
STATE_PARENT_I1 -> IKE_V2_I1
STATE_PARENT_I1 -> IKE_V2_I1
STATE_PARENT_I2 -> IKE_V2_I2
STATE_PARENT_I2 -> IKE_V2_I2
Line 7: Line 8:
STATE_PARENT_R1 -> IKE_V2_R1
STATE_PARENT_R1 -> IKE_V2_R1
STATE_PARENT_R2 -> IKE_V2_R2  
STATE_PARENT_R2 -> IKE_V2_R2  
 
</pre>


New child states if a Child SA is negotiated as part of ISAKMP_v2_SA_INIT, aka with Parent SA. During this process also parent advances its state. The following state name may not have entry in smc/svm table. Still they are states????
New child states if a Child SA is negotiated as part of ISAKMP_v2_SA_INIT, aka with Parent SA. During this process also parent advances its state. The following state name may not have entry in smc/svm table. Still they are states????
<pre>
V2_CHILD_I1 (If we are initiating as part of parent SA Negotiation. On initiator we duplicate when we get R1 back)
V2_CHILD_I1 (If we are initiating as part of parent SA Negotiation. On initiator we duplicate when we get R1 back)
V2_CHILD_I2
V2_CHILD_I2
V2_CHILD_R1  
V2_CHILD_R1  
V2_CHILD_R2     
V2_CHILD_R2     
 
</pre>
Child states if we create as part of CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange.  
Child states if we create as part of CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange.  
<pre>
-- The Parent SA just stays in I3/R2.  
-- The Parent SA just stays in I3/R2.  
-- We create/duplicate a state.  
-- We create/duplicate a state.  
Line 23: Line 25:
-- Inhert the Children from parent
-- Inhert the Children from parent
-- expire the parent. Switch to IKE_V2_I3/IKE_V2_R2
-- expire the parent. Switch to IKE_V2_I3/IKE_V2_R2
 
</pre>
V2_CHILD_XXI1
V2_CHILD_XXI1
V2_CHILD_XXI2
V2_CHILD_XXI2

Revision as of 18:43, 12 June 2014

Renaming IKEv2 States

STATE_PARENT_I1 -> IKE_V2_I1
STATE_PARENT_I2 -> IKE_V2_I2
STATE_PARENT_I3 -> IKE_V2_I3

STATE_PARENT_R1 -> IKE_V2_R1
STATE_PARENT_R2 -> IKE_V2_R2 

New child states if a Child SA is negotiated as part of ISAKMP_v2_SA_INIT, aka with Parent SA. During this process also parent advances its state. The following state name may not have entry in smc/svm table. Still they are states????

 
V2_CHILD_I1 (If we are initiating as part of parent SA Negotiation. On initiator we duplicate when we get R1 back)
V2_CHILD_I2
V2_CHILD_R1 
V2_CHILD_R2    

Child states if we create as part of CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange.

-- The Parent SA just stays in I3/R2. 
-- We create/duplicate a state. 
-- Add new keying material etc. 
-- Complete the negotiate. 
-- Inhert the Children from parent
-- expire the parent. Switch to IKE_V2_I3/IKE_V2_R2

V2_CHILD_XXI1 V2_CHILD_XXI2 V2_CHILD_XXR1 V2_CHILD_XXR2

When Parent is Re keying using the old parent. I guess we duplicate and send new SPI/COOKIES over the old one to negotiate. Newly duplicated parent need a name too V2_REKEY_I1 V2_REKEY_I2 V2_REKEY_R1 V2_REKEY_R1

Rekey Child SA over the existing parents. V2_CHILD_REKEY_I1 V2_CHILD_REKEY_I2 V2_CHILD_REKEY_R1 V2_CHILD_REKEY_R2

Multiple Child SA. It does seems the code support multiple child SA using st_hashchain_next.