AAScratch: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== virtiofs replace 9pfs: libvirt 6.2, qemu 5.0, kernel 5.4 == | == virtiofs replace 9pfs: libvirt 6.2, qemu 5.0, kernel 5.4 == | ||
* [https:// | |||
* [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694166 RH BZ | * [https://libvirt.org/news.html libvirt 6.2] Did not make to Fedora 32. F33 has libvirt 6.4 may pull rpm from F33. | ||
* [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694166 RH BZ tracking libvirtd merge] | |||
* [https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/5.0#virtio QEMU 5.0] added support for virtiofsd | |||
* [https://virtio-fs.gitlab.io virtio-fs] Made to Mainline kernel 5.4 | |||
* [https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=154446243024251&w=2 early comparison virtio-fs vs virtio-9p] | * [https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=154446243024251&w=2 early comparison virtio-fs vs virtio-9p] | ||
== KVM/QEMU + vsock to replace 9pfs == | == KVM/QEMU + vsock to replace 9pfs == | ||
KVM support for vsock and nfs support could have a better performance than 9pfs. | KVM support for vsock and nfs support could have a better performance than 9pfs. | ||
Revision as of 15:01, 5 June 2020
Antony's unsorted pages I want access quickly, related to libreswan, when think I know this page exist where is it. Someone moved it renamed ..
- XFRM pCPU
- XFRMi Development Notes 2018-2019
- Namespace Magic, 2019
- IKEv2 State names proposal 2016 - 2019
- Cloud Opportunistic Encryption(OE)
- Linux Kernel Support related to libreswan
virtiofs replace 9pfs: libvirt 6.2, qemu 5.0, kernel 5.4
- libvirt 6.2 Did not make to Fedora 32. F33 has libvirt 6.4 may pull rpm from F33.
- RH BZ tracking libvirtd merge
- QEMU 5.0 added support for virtiofsd
- virtio-fs Made to Mainline kernel 5.4
- early comparison virtio-fs vs virtio-9p
KVM/QEMU + vsock to replace 9pfs
KVM support for vsock and nfs support could have a better performance than 9pfs. This work could be interesting to libreswan KVM testing. It started in 2015. Slowly picking up, as 2018 it seems AWS and firecracker is pushing it. We are almost there.
- 2015 LWN virtio
VPP + DPDK IPsec
iptable rule to drop IKEv2 message id X
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/321252/drop-a-packet-depending-on-its-options-or-type