AAScratch: Difference between revisions

From Libreswan
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
*[https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2019/12/wireguard-vpn-is-a-step-closer-to-mainstream-adoption/ Wiregaurd BenchMark]
*[https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2019/12/wireguard-vpn-is-a-step-closer-to-mainstream-adoption/ Wiregaurd BenchMark]


== virtio-fs in kernel 5.4 and libvirt support 8.2+==
== virtiofs: libvirt 6.2, qemu 5.0, kernel 5.4 ==
* [https://virtio-fs.gitlab.io virtio-fs]
* [https://virtio-fs.gitlab.io virtio-fs]
* [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694166 RH BZ track libvirtd]
* [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694166 RH BZ track libvirtd]
* [https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=154446243024251&w=2 early comparison virtio-fs vs virtio-9p]
* [https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=154446243024251&w=2 early comparison virtio-fs vs virtio-9p]
* [https://libvirt.org/news.html libvirt features]


== KVM/QEMU + vsock to replace 9pfs ==
== KVM/QEMU + vsock to replace 9pfs ==

Revision as of 13:46, 5 June 2020

Antony's unsorted pages I want access quickly, related to libreswan, when think I know this page exist where is it. Someone moved it renamed ..

virtiofs: libvirt 6.2, qemu 5.0, kernel 5.4

KVM/QEMU + vsock to replace 9pfs

KVM support for vsock and nfs support could have a better performance than 9pfs. This work could be interesting to libreswan KVM testing. It started in 2015. Slowly picking up, as 2018 it seems AWS and firecracker is pushing it. We are almost there.

DPDK

2015 LWN virtio

iptable rule to drop IKEv2 message id X

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/321252/drop-a-packet-depending-on-its-options-or-type