Test Suite - Performance: Difference between revisions
(more notes) |
(more sections) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Boot | = Software - what is run by each test = | ||
== Boot the VMs == | |||
Before a test can be run all the VMs are (re)booted. Consequently one obvious way to speed up testing is to reduce the amount of time it takes to boot: | Before a test can be run all the VMs are (re)booted. Consequently one obvious way to speed up testing is to reduce the amount of time it takes to boot: | ||
Line 44: | Line 46: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
== Test | == Run the Test Scripts == | ||
To establish a baseline, <tt>enumcheck-01</tt>, which pretty much nothing, takes ~2s to run the test scripts once things are booted: | |||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
Line 52: | Line 54: | ||
... | ... | ||
w.runner enumcheck-01 34.03/34.00: stop running scripts west:west.sh west:final.sh after 1.5 seconds | w.runner enumcheck-01 34.03/34.00: stop running scripts west:west.sh west:final.sh after 1.5 seconds | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
everything else is slower. | everything else is slower. | ||
== Disk | To get a list of script times: | ||
<pre> | |||
$ awk '/: stop running scripts/ { print $3, $(NF-1) }' testing/pluto/*/OUTPUT/debug.log | sort -k2nr | head -5 | |||
newoe-05-hold-pass 295.6 | |||
newoe-04-pass-pass 226.7 | |||
ikev2-01-fallback-ikev1 212.5 | |||
newoe-10-expire-inactive-ike 205.6 | |||
ikev2-32-nat-rw-rekey 205.4 | |||
</pre> | |||
which can then be turned into a histogram: | |||
[[File:test-script-time-histogram.jpg]] | |||
=== sleep === | |||
=== ping === | |||
=== timeout === | |||
== Perform Post-mortem == | |||
This seems to be in the noise vis: | |||
<pre> | |||
m1.runner ipsec-hostkey-ckaid-01 12:44:50.01: start post-mortem ipsec-hostkey-ckaid-01 (test 725 of 739) at 2018-10-25 09:40:49.748041 | |||
m1.runner ipsec-hostkey-ckaid-01 12:44:50.03: ****** ipsec-hostkey-ckaid-01 (test 725 of 739) passed ****** | |||
m1.runner ipsec-hostkey-ckaid-01 12:44:50.03: stop post-mortem ipsec-hostkey-ckaid-01 (test 725 of 739) after 0.2 seconds | |||
</pre> | |||
= KVM Hardware = | |||
What the test runs on | |||
== Disk I/O == | |||
Something goes here? | Something goes here? | ||
== | == Memory == | ||
How much is needed? | |||
== CPU == | |||
Anything Here? Allowing use of HOST's h/w accelerators? | |||
= Docker Hardware = | |||
? | |||
= Case Study: speeding up "make kvm-test" by running things in parallel == | |||
Internally kvmrunner.py has two work queues: | Internally kvmrunner.py has two work queues: | ||
Line 82: | Line 127: | ||
* run independent testsuites in parallel | * run independent testsuites in parallel | ||
== The reboot thread pool - make KVM_WORKERS=... == | |||
Booting the domains is the most CPU intensive part of running a test, and trying to perform too many reboots in parallel will bog down the machine to the point where tests time out and interactive performance becomes hopeless. For this reason a pre-sized pool of reboot threads is used to reboot domains: | Booting the domains is the most CPU intensive part of running a test, and trying to perform too many reboots in parallel will bog down the machine to the point where tests time out and interactive performance becomes hopeless. For this reason a pre-sized pool of reboot threads is used to reboot domains: | ||
Line 110: | Line 155: | ||
Only if your machine has lots of cores should you consider adjusting this in Makefile.inc.local. | Only if your machine has lots of cores should you consider adjusting this in Makefile.inc.local. | ||
== The tests thread pool - make KVM_PREFIXES=... == | |||
Note that this is still somewhat experimental and has limitations: | Note that this is still somewhat experimental and has limitations: | ||
Line 170: | Line 215: | ||
Two domain groups (e.x., KVM_PREFIX=a. b.) seems to give the best results. | Two domain groups (e.x., KVM_PREFIX=a. b.) seems to give the best results. | ||
== Recommendations == | |||
=== Some Analysis === | |||
The test system: | The test system: | ||
Line 206: | Line 251: | ||
Notice how having more than #cores/2 KVM_WORKERS (here 2) has little benefit and failures edge upwards. | Notice how having more than #cores/2 KVM_WORKERS (here 2) has little benefit and failures edge upwards. | ||
=== Desktop Development Directory === | |||
* reduce build/install time - use only one prefix | * reduce build/install time - use only one prefix | ||
Line 227: | Line 272: | ||
but that, unfortunately, slows down the the build/install time. | but that, unfortunately, slows down the the build/install time. | ||
=== Desktop Baseline Directory === | |||
* do not overload the desktop - reduce CPU load by booting sequentially | * do not overload the desktop - reduce CPU load by booting sequentially | ||
Line 238: | Line 283: | ||
* KVM_PREFIX= b1. b2. | * KVM_PREFIX= b1. b2. | ||
=== Dedicated Test Server === | |||
* minimize total testsuite time | * minimize total testsuite time |
Revision as of 16:08, 25 October 2018
Software - what is run by each test
Boot the VMs
Before a test can be run all the VMs are (re)booted. Consequently one obvious way to speed up testing is to reduce the amount of time it takes to boot:
- make the boot faster - it should be around 1s
- boot several machines in parallel - however booting is CPU intensive (see below for analysis)
To determine where a VM is spending its time during boot, use systemd-analyze blame (do several runs, the very first boot does extra configuration so is always be slower):
$ ./testing/utils/kvmsh.py --boot cold w.east systemd-analyze blame virsh 0.01: starting domain virsh 15.05: 'login: ' matched after 13.7 seconds virsh 15.05: waiting 10 seconds for login prompt; 5 seconds for password prompt; 5 seconds for shell prompt virsh 15.05: 'login: ' matched after 0.0 seconds virsh 15.09: We're in after 0.5 seconds! [root@east ~]# systemd-analyze blame 7.576s network.service 843ms dev-vda1.device 781ms initrd-switch-root.service 776ms systemd-vconsole-setup.service 679ms sssd.service 526ms systemd-udev-trigger.service 235ms sysroot.mount 180ms dev-mqueue.mount 174ms dracut-cmdline.service 170ms kmod-static-nodes.service 162ms systemd-journald.service 159ms sys-kernel-debug.mount 152ms dev-hugepages.mount 151ms user@0.service 144ms systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev.service 144ms systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service 143ms systemd-remount-fs.service 137ms testing.mount 135ms fedora-readonly.service 135ms systemd-modules-load.service 127ms source.mount 119ms systemd-journal-flush.service 107ms initrd-parse-etc.service ....
Run the Test Scripts
To establish a baseline, enumcheck-01, which pretty much nothing, takes ~2s to run the test scripts once things are booted:
w.runner enumcheck-01 32.08/32.05: start running scripts west:west.sh west:final.sh at 2018-10-24 22:00:44.706355 ... w.runner enumcheck-01 34.03/34.00: stop running scripts west:west.sh west:final.sh after 1.5 seconds
everything else is slower.
To get a list of script times:
$ awk '/: stop running scripts/ { print $3, $(NF-1) }' testing/pluto/*/OUTPUT/debug.log | sort -k2nr | head -5 newoe-05-hold-pass 295.6 newoe-04-pass-pass 226.7 ikev2-01-fallback-ikev1 212.5 newoe-10-expire-inactive-ike 205.6 ikev2-32-nat-rw-rekey 205.4
which can then be turned into a histogram:
sleep
ping
timeout
Perform Post-mortem
This seems to be in the noise vis:
m1.runner ipsec-hostkey-ckaid-01 12:44:50.01: start post-mortem ipsec-hostkey-ckaid-01 (test 725 of 739) at 2018-10-25 09:40:49.748041 m1.runner ipsec-hostkey-ckaid-01 12:44:50.03: ****** ipsec-hostkey-ckaid-01 (test 725 of 739) passed ****** m1.runner ipsec-hostkey-ckaid-01 12:44:50.03: stop post-mortem ipsec-hostkey-ckaid-01 (test 725 of 739) after 0.2 seconds
KVM Hardware
What the test runs on
Disk I/O
Something goes here?
Memory
How much is needed?
CPU
Anything Here? Allowing use of HOST's h/w accelerators?
Docker Hardware
?
Case Study: speeding up "make kvm-test" by running things in parallel =
Internally kvmrunner.py has two work queues:
- a pool of reboot threads; each thread reboots one domain at a time
- a pool of test threads; each thread runs one test at a time using domains with a unique prefix
The test threads uses the reboot thread pool as follows:
- get the next test
- submit required domains to reboot pool
- wait for domains to reboot
- run test
- repeat
My adjusting KVM_WORKERS and KVM_PREFIXES it is possible:
- speed up test runs
- run independent testsuites in parallel
The reboot thread pool - make KVM_WORKERS=...
Booting the domains is the most CPU intensive part of running a test, and trying to perform too many reboots in parallel will bog down the machine to the point where tests time out and interactive performance becomes hopeless. For this reason a pre-sized pool of reboot threads is used to reboot domains:
- the default is 1 reboot thread limiting things to one domain reboot at a time
- KVM_WORKERS specifies the number of reboot threads, and hence, the reboot parallelism
- increasing this allows more domains to be rebooted in parallel
- however, increasing this consumes more CPU resources
To increase the size of the reboot thread pool set KVM_WORKERS. For instance:
$ grep KVM_WORKERS Makefile.inc.local KVM_WORKERS=2 $ make kvm-install kvm-test [...] runner 0.019: using a pool of 2 worker threads to reboot domains [...] runner basic-pluto-01 0.647/0.601: 0 shutdown/reboot jobs ahead of us in the queue runner basic-pluto-01 0.647/0.601: submitting shutdown jobs for unused domains: road nic north runner basic-pluto-01 0.653/0.607: submitting boot-and-login jobs for test domains: east west runner basic-pluto-01 0.654/0.608: submitted 5 jobs; currently 3 jobs pending [...] runner basic-pluto-01 28.585/28.539: domains started after 28 seconds
Only if your machine has lots of cores should you consider adjusting this in Makefile.inc.local.
The tests thread pool - make KVM_PREFIXES=...
Note that this is still somewhat experimental and has limitations:
- stopping parallel tests requires multiple control-c's
- since the duplicate domains have the same IP address, things like "ssh east" don't apply; use "make kvmsh-<prefix><domain>" or "sudo virsh console <prefix><domain" or "./testing/utils/kvmsh.py <prefix><domain>".
Tests spend a lot of their time waiting for timeouts or slow tasks to complete. So that tests can be run in parallel the KVM_PREFIX provides a list of prefixes to add to the host names forming unique domain groups that can each be used to run tests:
- the default is no prefix limiting things to a single global domain pool
- KVM_PREFIXES specifies the domain prefixes to use, and hence, the test parallelism
- increasing this allows more tests to be run in parallel
- however, increasing this consumes more memory and context switch resources
For instance, setting KVM_PREFIXES in Makefile.inc.local to specify a unique set of domains for this directory:
$ grep KVM_PREFIX Makefile.inc.local KVM_PREFIX=a. $ make kvm-install [...] $ make kvm-test [...] runner 0.018: using the serial test processor and domain prefix 'a.' [...] a.runner basic-pluto-01 0.574: submitting boot-and-login jobs for test domains: a.west a.east
And setting KVM_PREFIXES in Makefile.inc.local to specify two prefixes and, consequently, run two tests in parallel:
$ grep KVM_PREFIX Makefile.inc.local KVM_PREFIX=a. b. $ make kvm-install [...] $ make kvm-test [...] runner 0.019: using the parallel test processor and domain prefixes ['a.', 'b.'] [...] b.runner basic-pluto-02 0.632/0.596: submitting boot-and-login jobs for test domains: b.west b.east [...] a.runner basic-pluto-01 0.769/0.731: submitting boot-and-login jobs for test domains: a.west a.east
creates and uses two dedicated domain/network groups (a.east ..., and b.east ...).
Finally, to get rid of all the domains use:
$ make kvm-uninstall
or even:
$ make KVM_PREFIX=b. kvm-uninstall
Two domain groups (e.x., KVM_PREFIX=a. b.) seems to give the best results.
Recommendations
Some Analysis
The test system:
- 4-core 64-bit intel
- plenty of ram
- the file mk/perf.sh
Increasing the number of parallel tests, for a given number of reboot threads:
- having #cores/2 reboot threads has the greatest impact
- having more than #cores reboot threads seems to slow things down
Increasing the number of reboots, for a given number of test threads:
- adding a second test thread has a far greater impact than adding a second reboot thread - contrast top lines
- adding a third and even fourth test thread - i.e., up to #cores - still improves things
Finally here's some ASCII art showing what happens to the failure rate when the KVM_PREFIX is set so big that the reboot thread pool is kept 100% busy:
Fails Reboots Time ************ 127 1 6:35 **************************************** ************** 135 2 3:33 ********************* *************** 151 3 3:12 ******************* *************** 154 4 3:01 ******************
Notice how having more than #cores/2 KVM_WORKERS (here 2) has little benefit and failures edge upwards.
Desktop Development Directory
- reduce build/install time - use only one prefix
- reduce single-test time - boot domains in parallel
- use the non-prefix domains east et.al. so it is easy to access the test domains using tools like ssh
Lets assume 4 cores:
KVM_WORKERS=2 KVM_PREFIX=''
You could also add a second prefix vis:
KVM_PREFIX= '' a.
but that, unfortunately, slows down the the build/install time.
Desktop Baseline Directory
- do not overload the desktop - reduce CPU load by booting sequentially
- reduce total testsuite time - run tests in parallel
- keep separate to development directory above
Lets assume 4 cores
- KVM_WORKERS=1
- KVM_PREFIX= b1. b2.
Dedicated Test Server
- minimize total testsuite time
- maximize CPU use
- assume only testsuite running
Assuming 4 cores:
* KVM_WORKERS=2 * KVM_PREFIX= '' t1. t2. t3.