IKEv2 Child SA: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Renaming IKEv2 States STATE_PARENT_I1 -> IKE_V2_I1 STATE_PARENT_I2 -> IKE_V2_I2 STATE_PARENT_I3 -> IKE_V2_I3 STATE_PARENT_R1 -> IKE_V2_R1 STATE_PARENT_R2 -> IKE_V2_R2 New...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Renaming IKEv2 States | Renaming IKEv2 States | ||
<pre> | |||
STATE_PARENT_I1 -> IKE_V2_I1 | STATE_PARENT_I1 -> IKE_V2_I1 | ||
STATE_PARENT_I2 -> IKE_V2_I2 | STATE_PARENT_I2 -> IKE_V2_I2 | ||
Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
STATE_PARENT_R1 -> IKE_V2_R1 | STATE_PARENT_R1 -> IKE_V2_R1 | ||
STATE_PARENT_R2 -> IKE_V2_R2 | STATE_PARENT_R2 -> IKE_V2_R2 | ||
</pre> | |||
New child states if a Child SA is negotiated as part of ISAKMP_v2_SA_INIT, aka with Parent SA. During this process also parent advances its state. The following state name may not have entry in smc/svm table. Still they are states???? | New child states if a Child SA is negotiated as part of ISAKMP_v2_SA_INIT, aka with Parent SA. During this process also parent advances its state. The following state name may not have entry in smc/svm table. Still they are states???? | ||
<pre> | |||
V2_CHILD_I1 (If we are initiating as part of parent SA Negotiation. On initiator we duplicate when we get R1 back) | V2_CHILD_I1 (If we are initiating as part of parent SA Negotiation. On initiator we duplicate when we get R1 back) | ||
V2_CHILD_I2 | V2_CHILD_I2 | ||
V2_CHILD_R1 | V2_CHILD_R1 | ||
V2_CHILD_R2 | V2_CHILD_R2 | ||
</pre> | |||
Child states if we create as part of CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange. | Child states if we create as part of CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange. | ||
<pre> | |||
-- The Parent SA just stays in I3/R2. | -- The Parent SA just stays in I3/R2. | ||
-- We create/duplicate a state. | -- We create/duplicate a state. | ||
Line 23: | Line 25: | ||
-- Inhert the Children from parent | -- Inhert the Children from parent | ||
-- expire the parent. Switch to IKE_V2_I3/IKE_V2_R2 | -- expire the parent. Switch to IKE_V2_I3/IKE_V2_R2 | ||
</pre> | |||
V2_CHILD_XXI1 | V2_CHILD_XXI1 | ||
V2_CHILD_XXI2 | V2_CHILD_XXI2 |
Revision as of 17:43, 12 June 2014
Renaming IKEv2 States
STATE_PARENT_I1 -> IKE_V2_I1 STATE_PARENT_I2 -> IKE_V2_I2 STATE_PARENT_I3 -> IKE_V2_I3 STATE_PARENT_R1 -> IKE_V2_R1 STATE_PARENT_R2 -> IKE_V2_R2
New child states if a Child SA is negotiated as part of ISAKMP_v2_SA_INIT, aka with Parent SA. During this process also parent advances its state. The following state name may not have entry in smc/svm table. Still they are states????
V2_CHILD_I1 (If we are initiating as part of parent SA Negotiation. On initiator we duplicate when we get R1 back) V2_CHILD_I2 V2_CHILD_R1 V2_CHILD_R2
Child states if we create as part of CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange.
-- The Parent SA just stays in I3/R2. -- We create/duplicate a state. -- Add new keying material etc. -- Complete the negotiate. -- Inhert the Children from parent -- expire the parent. Switch to IKE_V2_I3/IKE_V2_R2
V2_CHILD_XXI1 V2_CHILD_XXI2 V2_CHILD_XXR1 V2_CHILD_XXR2
When Parent is Re keying using the old parent. I guess we duplicate and send new SPI/COOKIES over the old one to negotiate. Newly duplicated parent need a name too V2_REKEY_I1 V2_REKEY_I2 V2_REKEY_R1 V2_REKEY_R1
Rekey Child SA over the existing parents. V2_CHILD_REKEY_I1 V2_CHILD_REKEY_I2 V2_CHILD_REKEY_R1 V2_CHILD_REKEY_R2
Multiple Child SA. It does seems the code support multiple child SA using st_hashchain_next.