XFRM pCPU: Difference between revisions

From Libreswan
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 74: Line 74:


== Linux kernel XFRM details ==
== Linux kernel XFRM details ==
Most changes are SAdb entry aka state, or SA. The new concept is head SA and sub SA. It is supported with additional flags, and attributes of SADB entry. SA policy should not specify SPI???  Check with Ben. He said it work too.


You need extra flags to XFRM_MSG_GETSA  and XFRM_MSG_UPDSA, XFRM_MSG_GETSA, only for the out SA.
You need extra flags to XFRM_MSG_GETSA  and XFRM_MSG_UPDSA, XFRM_MSG_GETSA, only for the out SA.
Line 94: Line 95:
* also set XFRMA_SRCADDR to src addr
* also set XFRMA_SRCADDR to src addr


== what kind work load is supported ==
== Work load is supported ==
As of Nov 2019 only
As of Nov 2019 only support traffic that can be distributed over multiple CPUs.


=== can we distribute 4 tuple workload ===  
If it is a local traffic that need to encrypted to IPsec, you need to start the application different CPUs using taskset or numactl.
If it is forwarded traffic you need RSS support on the receive side of clear text. With RSS you can steer different flows into different CPU, hence different SA.
 
=== can we distribute 4 tuple flows locally generated? ===  
yes. The application on the sender side must run on the right CPU, aka use something like "taskset 0x1 ping -n -c 2 -I 192.0.1.254 192.0.2.254" or numactl, or something
yes. The application on the sender side must run on the right CPU, aka use something like "taskset 0x1 ping -n -c 2 -I 192.0.1.254 192.0.2.254" or numactl, or something


Revision as of 02:15, 18 November 2019

Goal: scalable IPsec throughput with multiple CPUs(with IPsec HW offload)

The ide of per CPU SA in the outgoing direction was discussed at Linux IPsec workshop March 2019, in Prague. During the following days a small group of people worked on a prototype of user space(IKE), Libreswan, and Linux kernel, xfrm. The libreswan call the options "clones". In Kernel it is called pCPU. These names may change as we adopt the idea to TOS bits oer TCP/UDP DST port hashing.

Results

The test result, as Nov 2019, show the aggregated throughput increase linearly with the number of CPUs. We tested using physical servers, with Mellonex CX4 NIC. These NICs (latest Linux driver CX5) support RSS for ESP. In the test the clear text traffic was generated using a hardware traffic generator and IPsec gateway forwarding it to the other IPsec gateway which decrypt and the traffic generator receives the clear text. 

|Traffic generator|-----|IPsec Gateweay west|=====ipsec 40Gbps link====|ipsec gateway|---|traffic generator|

The initial number are 17-18 Gbps with 3 flows we see about 6-7Gbps per CPU

How to test this

Libreswan source with clones support #clones-3

git clone --single-branch --branch clones-3 https://github.com/antonyantony/libreswan

Sample config | ipsec.conf 

conn westnet-eastnet
	rightid=@east
        leftid=@west
        left=192.1.2.45
        right=192.1.2.23
	rightsubnet=192.0.2.0/24
	leftsubnet=192.0.1.0/24
	authby=secret
        clones=2
        auto=add
        nic-offload=no

ipsec auto --up westnet-eastnet
taskset 0x1 ping -n -c 2 -I 192.0.1.254 192.0.2.254
taskset 0x2 ping -n -c 2 -I 192.0.1.254 192.0.2.254

ipsec trafficstatus

ipsec whack --trafficstatus
006 #2: "westnet-eastnet-0", type=ESP, add_time=1234567890, inBytes=0, outBytes=0, id='@east'
006 #4: "westnet-eastnet-1", type=ESP, add_time=1234567890, inBytes=168, outBytes=168, id='@east'
006 #3: "westnet-eastnet-2", type=ESP, add_time=1234567890, inBytes=168, outBytes=168, id='@east'

NOTE both SA #3 and #4 has outgoing traffic on it.

Kernel source with pCPU #pcpu-2

git clone -b pcpu-2 https://github.com/antonyantony/linux

Kernel / xfrm plans

  • Release private branch by Steffen's repository for wider testing.
  • Kernel support for rekey. One could rekey in any order - either a head SA or the sub SA.
  • One main difference is when installing a new sub SA during a rekey, add_sa() would delete the old sub SA. Libreswan should not try to delete it.
  • Ben would like to add feature bind a sub sa to a head SA?
  • seems to need latest iproute2 otherwise "ip x s" may loop.
  • bug fixes

Libreswan Plans

  • Currently support clones=n. Both sides should have same number.
  • support for asymmetric configuration, one side 8(initiator) and responder (4).
  • fix rekey, we should not delete a sub SA. Only delete the head SA during it's rekey.
  • fix bugs ipsec auto --down and delete
  • don't allow clone instance on its own to add|delete|down : using the unaliased name.
  • test interop with unsupported version. ideally we should figure it out and not install clones. It could be that we will install clones and the last one would be used.

nCPU < nSAs

Lets say there are 4 cpus and number of clone configured is 8, because the other end has 8 CPUs. The head SA's list only has 4 places for sub SAs. Libreswan should install only 4 send SAs ONLY.

A bit detail about Child SA initiator and what the initiator and responder are committing. As I understand the RFC, also from Tero, when an initiator send a request to setup an SA, IKE Child SA requst(both in IKE_AUTH and CREATE_CHILD SA) is a bi directional SA, the initiator is committing to receive on that SA. Also the responder is committing to recive and not to send. The 4CPU side IKE daemon will install 8 Receive SAs and 4 sub SAs then everything would work.


Linux kernel XFRM details

Most changes are SAdb entry aka state, or SA. The new concept is head SA and sub SA. It is supported with additional flags, and attributes of SADB entry. SA policy should not specify SPI??? Check with Ben. He said it work too.

You need extra flags to XFRM_MSG_GETSA and XFRM_MSG_UPDSA, XFRM_MSG_GETSA, only for the out SA.

XFRM_MSG_NEWSA head SA

XFRMA_SA_EXTRA_FLAGS set XFRM_SA_PCPU_HEAD flag

XFRM_MSG_NEWSA sub SA

XFRMA_SA_EXTRA_FLAGS set XFRM_SA_PCPU_SUB AND

new attribute XFRMA_SA_PCPU <cpu id>. CPU SA ID start from 0, and it is a u32.

XFRM_MSG_UPDSA

both head SA and sub SA need extra attributes.

  • head SA set XFRMA_SA_EXTRA_FLAGS to XFRM_SA_PCPU_HEAD
  • sub SA set XFRMA_SA_EXTRA_FLAGS to XFRM_SA_PCPU_SUB AND XFRMA_SA_PCPU to <sub-sa-id>. Sub SA ID start from 0-u32

XFRM_MSG_GETSA call only change for sub sda

  • sub SA XFRMA_SA_EXTRA_FLAGS set XFRM_SA_PCPU_SUB AND XFRMA_SA_PCPU to <sub-sa-id>.
  • also set XFRMA_SRCADDR to src addr

Work load is supported

As of Nov 2019 only support traffic that can be distributed over multiple CPUs.

If it is a local traffic that need to encrypted to IPsec, you need to start the application different CPUs using taskset or numactl. If it is forwarded traffic you need RSS support on the receive side of clear text. With RSS you can steer different flows into different CPU, hence different SA.

can we distribute 4 tuple flows locally generated?

yes. The application on the sender side must run on the right CPU, aka use something like "taskset 0x1 ping -n -c 2 -I 192.0.1.254 192.0.2.254" or numactl, or something

Receiver side RSS support

To get this working you need Receive Side Scaling RSS The receiver NIC should be able steer different flows, based on SPI, into separate Qs otherwise receiver seems to getting overwhelmed. We used Mellonex CX4 to test. Some cards initially tested did not seems to support RSS for ESP flows, instead only TCP and UDP. While figuring out RSS for these cards we tried a bit different approch. ESP in UDP encapsulation, along with ESP in UDP GRO patches we could see the flows getting distributed on the receiver.

= RSS Commands

Enable GRO and it should work. ideally you should be able to run the following, 

 ethtool -N <nic> rx-flow-hash esp4

Another argument is if the NIC agnostic the 16 bits of SPI, of ESP packet, is aligned with UDP port number and should provide enough entropy. 

 ethtool -N eno2 rx-flow-hash udp4 sdfn
Retrieved from "https://libreswan.org/wiki/index.php?title=XFRM_pCPU&oldid=21767"